Energy Online

Wind turbineCoal Power StationSolar CellNuclear Power StationSolar power plant

Readers Respond on "A Path to Sustainable Energy by 2030"

Readers Respond on "A Path to Sustainable Energy by 2030"

Article Date: Friday 12 03 10 14:00:00
Article Source: Scientific American - Energy
Main Article Link: http://rss.sciam.com/click.phdo?i=abe4733839f4cc3831c45c6aa0071b9a

Winds of Change I found it surprising that in “ A Path to Sustainable Energy by 2030 ,” Mark Z. Jacobson and Mark A. Delucchi do not mention the effects of the suggested energy sources on climate. The authors propose to absorb about six terawatts of energy from about 60 terawatts available in the wind, or about 10 percent of its total energy. Because the winds, at least near the U.S., usually flow around highs or lows, where the speed and related Coriolis force tend to maintain the pressure difference, I can easily envision that absorbing the energy will change the rate at which the pressure centers collapse. How this would change the weather, I do not know, but it must make a change to give us some of the energy. Possibly, the weather change would be an improvement, but as a believer in Murphy’s Law, I would be surprised. About 100 years ago dumping garbage into the ocean was justified because the oceans were infinite compared to the effect, so no one calculated how much was allowable. Let’s be smarter this time! Why not do the calculations before we cause more problems? [More]

Add to digg Add to StumbleUpon Add to Reddit Add to Facebook Add to del.icio.us Email this Article

©2006 Paper Free Planet Search Engine Optimisation
Pizza and Takeaways Delivered to Your Door from Pizza Online
Contact us Links FAQ